Here's some reading to get you in the mood:
...our whole system of government was based on the idea that the purpose of the state was to preserve individual liberties, not to dictate them. The founders uniformly despised many practices in England that compromised matters of individual conscience by restricting freedom of speech. Freedom of speech – the right to talk, write, publish, discuss – was so important to the founders that it was the first amendment to the Constitution – and without it, the Constitution never would have been ratified.
How then, can we claim that the founders would support the restriction of access to a book that really is just about an idea, to be accepted or rejected as you choose?
-Jamie LaRue
excerpted from: http://jaslarue.blogspot.com/2008/07/un ... dding.html
Happy
I do maintain restrict the material my Children are exposed to and read .... I guess reflection is required here 
News
Site map
SitemapIndex
RSS Feed